small fix, don't worry about it

.blackbox/skills/seo/references/cwv-thresholds.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Core Web Vitals Thresholds (INP-era)
+
+Use field data first (CrUX/RUM), then lab data for diagnosis.
+
+## Primary Metrics
+
+| Metric | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor |
+|--------|------|-------------------|------|
+| LCP | <= 2.5s | > 2.5s and <= 4.0s | > 4.0s |
+| INP | <= 200ms | > 200ms and <= 500ms | > 500ms |
+| CLS | <= 0.10 | > 0.10 and <= 0.25 | > 0.25 |
+
+## Supporting Diagnostics
+
+Use these as diagnostic hints, not ranking stand-ins:
+
+| Metric | Suggested Target |
+|--------|------------------|
+| TTFB | <= 0.8s |
+| FCP | <= 1.8s |
+| Total Blocking Time (lab) | <= 200ms |
+| Main-thread long tasks | < 50ms each where possible |
+
+## Measurement Hierarchy
+
+1. Field data source priority:
+   - CrUX (origin + URL level if available)
+   - First-party RUM
+2. Lab data source priority:
+   - PageSpeed Insights lab profile
+   - Lighthouse (mobile + throttled) for reproducible debugging
+
+## Audit Instructions
+
+1. Compare mobile first, then desktop.
+2. Classify each page template by CWV risk:
+   - Critical: poor in any primary metric on key template
+   - High: needs improvement on key conversion template
+   - Medium: issue on secondary templates
+3. Map root causes:
+   - LCP: render-blocking CSS/JS, slow HTML, heavy hero image
+   - INP: long JS tasks, expensive handlers, third-party script contention
+   - CLS: unsized media, ad/embed shifts, late DOM injections
+4. Propose one quick win and one structural fix per failing metric.
+
+## Rules
+
+- Always use INP. Do not reference FID as a current optimization target.
+- Avoid over-claiming from synthetic tests alone.
+- If field data is unavailable, clearly label findings as provisional.