small fix, don't worry about it

.blackbox/skills/seo/references/eeat-framework.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# E-E-A-T Evaluation Framework
+
+Use this rubric to evaluate content quality for competitive queries.
+
+## Dimensions
+
+Score each dimension from 0 to 5:
+
+| Dimension | What to Check |
+|-----------|---------------|
+| Experience | First-hand evidence, practical examples, real usage context |
+| Expertise | Subject competence, technical accuracy, depth, specialist language used correctly |
+| Authoritativeness | Reputation signals, citations, recognized brand/person entities |
+| Trustworthiness | Accuracy, transparency, policy clarity, editorial rigor, safety disclosures |
+
+## Query Stakes Classification
+
+Classify intent before scoring:
+
+- YMYL-high: finance, health, legal, safety
+- Commercial-high: high-ticket buying decisions
+- Informational-competitive: dense SERP competition with strong entities
+- Informational-low: low-risk, basic educational intent
+
+Raise trust requirements for higher-stakes intents.
+
+## Evidence Checklist
+
+Review per template:
+
+1. Authorship clarity:
+   - named author
+   - credentials or role
+   - updated timestamp
+2. Source quality:
+   - primary sources cited
+   - external corroboration
+   - quote/context integrity
+3. Editorial quality:
+   - original analysis (not paraphrased commodity text)
+   - internal consistency across pages
+   - clear claims with evidence
+4. Trust assets:
+   - about page and editorial policy
+   - contact and business identity
+   - privacy and terms links
+5. User value:
+   - intent match
+   - completeness
+   - actionable depth
+
+## Risk Flags
+
+Flag as high risk when you find:
+- anonymous or credential-free expert claims on high-stakes pages
+- copied or near-duplicate boilerplate across key landing pages
+- medical/financial/legal recommendations without sourcing
+- exaggerated claims without verifiable proof
+
+## Scoring Output Format
+
+Return:
+1. Overall content quality score (0-100)
+2. Per-dimension scores mapped from rubric
+3. Top 3 trust risks
+4. Fastest high-impact remediation actions
+
+## Remediation Patterns
+
+- Add expert-reviewed blocks with named reviewers on high-stakes pages.
+- Replace generic intros with first-hand evidence and data-backed claims.
+- Add citation discipline: primary sources first, then secondary context.
+- Standardize author bylines, update dates, and revision ownership.